A FAIRLY PLAUSIBLE SCENARIO........

 

*How was Khomeini created to manage the chaos in the Middle East to this day?*

Noël Lechâteau was not an exile… but an operations room…

In politics, there are no "innocent coincidences" when it comes to changing major regimes...
No revolutions descend from the sky without ladders.
What happened in Iran in the late seventies was not just the fall of the Shah and the rise of a religious man, but a calculated transfer of power from an expired instrument to one more suitable for the next stage.
Anyone who reads the documents on which I based my articles, and which will be published when I publish my book, will realize that Khomeini was not an incident, but a project...
And that "Noël-le-Château" was not a quiet French village, but a "stage" where the leader was tailored to fit international needs...

This may seem shocking to those still captive to the romantic narrative of the "revolution of the oppressed," but history, when read from the angle of interests rather than from the angle of slogans, exposes itself.
The real question is not: Why did the Shah fall? But:
Why was Khomeini specifically chosen?
And why did France, which supposedly prohibits political activity on its territory, open all doors for him to turn a remote village into a global broadcasting center?

The truth is clear:
The Shah was not overthrown because he was an enemy of America, but because he overstepped his bounds a little...
He began building a strong army.
He hinted at buying weapons from the Soviets.
- Raising the oil ceiling
- And he closed off hotspots of tension that Washington preferred to keep simmering...
*Herein lies the principle that summarizes the behavior of empires:
It does not first bring down its opponents, but rather it brings down its tools when it thinks that it has become a "state" and not a "job".

Henry Kissinger says – with painful realism – that great powers do not reward loyalty, but rather utility.
This is not a personal cruelty on his part, but rather a description of a global system that discards allies like one discards gloves when they get dirty.
The Shah was a useful glove, then he became a disturbing glove that scratched sensitive American skin!

And here's where the most clever part of the script begins:
The goal was not to replace the Shah with a strong, independent adversary, but with an alternative capable of generating long-term chaos, without completely severing ties with the West...
Therefore, the choice was not a nationalist officer who might lead a nationalist coup that would break away from the house of obedience.
No leftist would throw themselves into Moscow's lap.
There is no weak liberal without a street...
The choice was a religious man, because a religious man does not need an economic program or an institutional vision to rule; it is enough for him to possess a “sanctity” that absolves him of accountability, and to possess a “street” that protects him with anger.

*In the 1953 Musaddiq experiment, the CIA learned the most important lesson: religious figures are the quickest key to the minds of the masses...*
*When the first coup failed, the CIA did not save its plan with tanks, but rather by activating the network of religious figures and buying loyalties with money, then pushing the street to revolt against Mossadegh...*
This is not a novel, but a recurring pattern: money + the pulpit + the street = a successful coup.

Therefore, when Washington wanted to get rid of the Shah, it did not go to the political parties or the elites, but went directly to the religious figures.
She was not interested in who "hated" her in his speech, but rather in who could control the masses and turn politics into a religious ritual, because ritual is not up for discussion.

And so Khomeini awoke from his long slumber in Najaf....
He was not transferred to a nearby Muslim country, but rather smuggled out across the border and then taken to France. France supposedly stipulated that he refrain from political activity, but the opposite occurred:
Noël Le Chateau has turned into a media beehive working twenty-four hours a day...
It was as if the whole world had suddenly discovered that a man in a French village deserved to have broadcasting towers erected for him, radio stations opened for him, and newspapers racing to report his words.

This is not support for a revolutionary, but rather the creation of a symbol.

George Orwell said: “He who has the power to shape language has the power to shape consciousness.”

Khomeini did not initially triumph through weapons, but rather through the language that was formulated for him, and the image that was portrayed of him.
He became a “leader,” not because he was the most knowledgeable or the wisest, but because he was the most likely to be the embodiment of the entire scene.
And here came the moment of the great deception: a religious man was polished as the “voice of the people,” while other political forces were more organized and present.

The most ironic thing is that the wave of glorification was not limited to the media, but was also joined by great philosophers such as Michel Foucault, Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir...!!
Foucault, who was supposed to see the mechanisms of power, fell under the spell of "spiritual revolution," and later apologized after seeing the blood...
But the belated apology doesn't change the fact that he contributed to marketing the myth.
*Here we understand the meaning of Hannah Arendt's statement:*
"The most dangerous thing about totalitarian regimes is not that they lie, but that they make people get used to lying until it becomes reality!"

*When Khomeini returned to Tehran, he did not begin building a state, but rather began eliminating his partners...*
Because the systems we use do not allow for multiple heads....
Getting rid of the men of the moment:
Yazdi, Qutbzadeh, Abolhassan Banisadr, then it was the turn of the most difficult number: Beheshti.
*This pattern is not random, but a rule:*
Everyone who helped in the ascent becomes a danger after the arrival.

Then came the hostage drama, which credible documents indicate was not merely a revolutionary act against America, but a card played within the American elections between Carter and Reagan.

*Herein lies the essence of Khomeiniism:*
-Open hostility boosts popularity
-And deep understandings that preserve the job....
** The job was clear: to create a permanent regional adversary, to frighten the Gulf, to drain Iraq, to ​​lay the groundwork for a long sectarian conflict, and to make the whole region need an "international mediator."
It never disappears.
From here, the connection with today becomes clear and effortless....
What is happening in the region now is not a "breakaway" from the past, but a direct extension of it...

Iran today, under Khamenei or whoever comes after him, is not a normal state project, but rather an influence project based on proxies.
She doesn't need to win militarily as much as she needs to keep the fire burning....
Because when the fire goes out, the question that every ideological system fears returns:

What is your legitimacy domestically? And why should we pay the price for your projects?

Therefore, the developments in Iran today are not just an economic crisis or social protests, but rather the beginning of a crack in the equation:
The Iranian people no longer see a "revolution," but rather the price they are paying.
They believe that Khomeiniism has turned into a privileged class.
And that the Revolutionary Guard has become a state within a state
And that doctrine has become a meaningless means of control....

This is the most dangerous thing that regimes face: when people lose faith, only fear remains, and fear does not build a future.

Khomeini, therefore, was not the antithesis of the Shah, but rather the most suitable alternative for managing a new phase:
A phase of calculated chaos, a protracted conflict, and a bleeding equilibrium.
Today, when we look at the burning maps from Iraq to Syria to Yemen, we don't need much intelligence to understand that Khomeiniism was not just an internal Iranian event, but a re-engineering of the Middle East.

*I repeat the conclusion that should be said at the end of every article, and with coldness:*
Khomeini died, but what was created for him did not die; because systems do not live by individuals, but by functions....
*When the job ends, the symbol falls away, even if its image remains hanging on the walls.*
*=================*
*Ihsan Al-Faqih.*
*From the book Khomeini and Khomeinism... The Origin of the Story.*

As received by email, originally in Arabic, translated and forwarded to the benefit of our blog readers.,, I haven't read the book myself, but the idea in this short summary is pretty clear.    

As always, my many thanks to all.   

IGNORING THE UNITED NATION OR SHUTTING IT DOWN.....

 

The release of a new, draft Special Report from the UN Rapporteur for Palestine (officially, “the UN Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967”) should have been headline news around the world. Regrettably—and unsurprisingly—it was not.

The report, entitled “Gaza Genocide is a Collective Crime,” is summarized as follows:

“The ongoing genocide in Gaza is a collective crime, sustained by the complicity of influential Third States that have enabled longstanding systemic violations of international law by Israel. Framed by colonial narratives that dehumanize the Palestinians, this live-streamed atrocity has been facilitated through Third States’ direct support, material aid, diplomatic protection and, in some cases, active participation. It has exposed an unprecedented chasm between peoples and their governments, betraying the trust on which global peace and security rest.”

The summary concludes:

“The world now stands on a knife-edge between the collapse of the international rule of law and hope for renewal. Renewal is only possible if complicity is confronted, responsibilities are met and justice is upheld.”

The report states that the complicit nations’ “disregard for international law undermines the foundations of the multilateral order painstakingly built over eight decades by States and people within the United Nations.”

Many observers have concluded the same thing. The open disregard for international law and human decency reflects the ongoing collapse of the 20^th-century world order, with increasingly catastrophic results.

The report adds, “This will stand in history as an offence not only to justice, but to the very idea of our common humanity.”

Indeed.

Another important aspect of the report is the way it highlights the complicity of many Arab and Muslim nations in the genocide of Palestinians, despite their professions of solidarity. While it correctly notes that “Many States, primarily Western ones, have facilitated, legitimized and eventually normalized the genocidal campaign perpetrated by Israel,” this betrayal is evident throughout the report.

Richard (RJ) Eskow from The Zero Hour Report.

A Newsletter from Richard (RJ) Eskow. eskow@substack

As received by email from this excellent and courageous site.

 again forwarded to the benefit of our blog readers, as this 

United Nations report summarizes the situation completely . 

And nothing more than the board of peace and its invitees

 and adherents to sideline the United Nations and marginalize 

it. ending its role in world peace. 

 the full report with many more detailed figures and numbers 

describing the complicity 

of European and Arab countries are in the full UN report itself.

 I urge everyone to find them..... 

My many thanks to all. 

BEHAVIORAL CONFLICTS .......

 

Boussenna Mohamed

  

What Italy has just done to its Muslims changes everything!!!

Giorgia Meloni's Italy is on the brink: the radical law against separatism is shaking the West.

Article: Italy has just made a decision that could well redefine the contours of Western civilization as we know it. What is currently happening in Rome is not simply a new line in the European penal code; it is a political and cultural earthquake whose repercussions are already being felt far beyond the Alps. Under the leadership of Giorgia Meloni, the Italian government has launched an unprecedented legislative offensive aimed at protecting what it calls the national identity and Christian roots of Europe.

A historic turning point for the peninsula

The ruling party, Brothers of Italy, has introduced sweeping legislation banning the wearing of the burqa and niqab in all public spaces nationwide. This measure extends beyond administrative buildings to include schools, shops, offices, and even the streets. Supporters of the law argue that it is a matter of public safety and human dignity, while critics see it as a brutal attack on individual liberties.

The bill also mandates identity checks for anyone wearing clothing that fully covers their face. Italian police now have the authority to stop and document these individuals without prior suspicion. The message from Rome is crystal clear: social integration and respect for common civic norms are no longer negotiable. Violators face fines of up to $3,000, a deterrent amount that underscores the government's determination to enforce this new law.

Giorgia Meloni's vision: Defending Christian identity

At the heart of this transformation is the figure of Giorgia Meloni. The Italian Prime Minister, known for her outspokenness and unabashed nationalism, doesn't mince words. She has repeatedly stated that, in her view, there is a fundamental incompatibility between certain interpretations of Islamic culture and the Christian values ​​that built Europe.

Meloni highlights a particularly sensitive issue: foreign funding. According to Italian authorities, a large number of the country's Islamic cultural centers are financed by nations such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar. For the government, it is unacceptable that foreign governments should be able to shape Italian public life or undermine the country's constitutional values. This law is therefore not simply a matter of clothing or fashion; it is an act of sovereignty in the face of what Meloni calls cultural separatism.

A global fight against "cultural separatism"

Italy's legislative arsenal doesn't stop at the full-face veil. The text proposes a series of measures aimed at dismantling what the government calls "parallel societies." Key points include extremely strict transparency rules for mosque funding, harsher penalties for forced marriages, and criminal consequences for performing virginity tests.

Andrea Delmastro, one of the legislators behind this bill, forcefully summarized the government's position: religious freedom is sacred, but it must be exercised openly and in full respect of the Constitution. This vision places public law and civic norms above private or religious ideologies. This is where the battle line is drawn: the State reaffirms its primacy over all forms of alternative jurisdiction.

Europe facing a civilizational shift

What is happening in Italy is part of a much broader movement across Europe. For decades, the continent has questioned its capacity to absorb divergent cultures and ideologies. France was the first to respond with a firm “no” in 2011 by banning the full-face veil. Belgium, Denmark, Austria, and Switzerland followed suit.

Today, Italy is taking a further step by explicitly linking these restrictions to a civilizational defense strategy. Under the Meloni government, migrant arrivals were reduced by nearly half thanks to tough agreements with North African countries. Between January 2023 and July 2024, Italy deported 130 people for reasons of national security and arrested 36 individuals labeled as extremists. Despite the presence of 1.5 million Muslims within its borders, Italy still refuses to officially recognize Islam as a legally protected religion, a strong signal of its desire to maintain a unified national framework.

Conclusion: A model for the West?

The return of religion to the public sphere, but in the form of a protective Christian heritage, is a growing trend. From Viktor Orban's Hungary to Marine Le Pen's France, the idea that European civilization is threatened by an unassimilated foreign influence is becoming a major political driving force.

For observers like Dr. Steve Turley, Italy is the “tip of the spear” of a civilizational populism that seeks to restore beauty, faith, and tradition to the heart of the city. Whether one supports or condemns these measures, one thing is certain: Giorgia Meloni’s Italy has chosen its side. It is betting on strengthened civic unity, uncompromising national sovereignty, and fierce protection of its historical identity. The choice is now clear for the rest of the West: bold action to preserve civilization or hesitation in the face of growing fragmentation. Rome has already made its decision.

A frank and realistic report by this columnist on Facebook describing a long due situation taking place in most European countries and lately in America and Canada, a major problem of assimilation and integration, it's not over yet, but taking shape in many parts of the world.

As always, my many thanks to all.

WEAPONIZING RELIGIONS......

 

by Jonathan Kuttab
Last week, Palestinian Christians following the Eastern Calendar celebrated Christmas. January 6 is recognized by the Palestinian Authority as a national holiday, with government and municipal offices closed for Eastern Christmas, just as they are on December 25 for Western Christmas and major Muslim holidays. This may come as a surprise to many Americans, who are still fed the line that Palestinian Christians are persecuted by the Palestinian Authority and that the dwindling Christian population is shrinking as a result of Islamic extremism rather than the ongoing Israeli occupation.
Netanyahu has also recently announced that Israel needs to be the “defender of Christians” throughout the region and that Israel would be prepared to act militarily to support and defend minorities, especially Christians in Africa and elsewhere. Already, Israel is interfering in Syria, here claiming to support the Druze minority, and it has moved into Somaliland with similar justifications. Now, he is aspiring to become a dominant regional power as a so-called defender of Christians.
All this sounds absolutely bizarre to Palestinians, who know Israel’s long record of harassment towards Christians, their churches, and their holy places. Christian priests in Jerusalem are spat upon and berated by religious Jews on a daily basis. Christian Palestinians face the same enmity, and their property and land is equally coveted by Israel because the state views them in the same light as it views their Muslim compatriots.
This became particularly clear to me this week as I visited the Christian village of Taybeh, in the Ramallah area of the West Bank. The ancient church in that village was attacked by Jewish settlers who also set fire to part of its property. Churches and church institutions in Gaza have been attacked and bombed by the Israeli army, including the third oldest Christian Church in the world, the Church of Saint Porphyrius in Gaza City, as well as the Arab Al Ahli “Baptist” hospital in Gaza City. Israel is also moving to tax church property in Jerusalem in violation of the centuries old tradition of exempting such properties from taxation, a potential death blow for local Christian institutions.
A recently-leaked secret memorandum from AIPAC reveals that Zionist propagandists, after doing some field research, have decided that the best argument in support of Israel is to attack Islam. While support for Israel is rapidly declining, there still exists a lot of suspicion, ignorance and hatred for Islam and Muslims in the West. Americans, who may not feel much sympathy towards Israel these days, are still vulnerable to ads and arguments stoking fear of Islam and Shari’a law. References to so-called “Judaeo-Christian values” deliberately exclude and cast suspicion on Islam and Muslims as a dangerous or inferior “other,” while positing a unity of purpose between the state of Israel and Christians in the West. Interfaith activities often ignore Islam, seeking to project unity and affinity between Christians and Jews at the expense of Muslims.
It is important to firmly oppose such trends for a number of reasons. For one thing, the Muslim community in America is still very vulnerable, and it does not have access to the solidarity, resources, official backing and acceptance that the Jewish community has achieved after many years of discrimination and marginalization. While anti-Jewish attitudes still persist in some significant portions of the population, it is often quickly exposed and properly confronted. Private and official bodies are constantly on the lookout for anti-Jewish animus. Publications, speeches and statements are assiduously monitored and any hint of perceived anti-Jewish antisemitism is duly denounced and dealt with. This is as it should be. Unfortunately, the fight against such antisemitism has also been effectively weaponized to shield Zionism and Israel from criticism and to stifle any reasonable discussion of Palestine/Israel. Bias against Islam and Muslims, by contrast, is regularly tolerated, at times even celebrated, and hardly results in proper rebuke or serious consequences.
Another reason to oppose such trends is that the core issues between Israel and Palestinians are purely political, involving disputes over land and population. Viewing the situation as a religious conflict between Judaism and Islam (with Christianity weighing in on the side of the Jews, whom they persecuted in the past) is both inaccurate and dangerous. It pits groups against each other, with God supposedly taking sides. It also justifies the most extreme positions, as adherents of each faith feel they are doing God’s will when they oppose their infidel enemies. And with “God on their side,” it is both useless and even “sacrilegious” to give in to others who are considered heathen and infidels. This is true both for Jews and Muslims. Thankfully, since the times of the Crusades, Christians do not raise exclusive claims to the Holy Land in the name of their God. Yet, adherents of all three religions have a religious connection to the Holy Land, with sacred sites, places of worship and important pilgrimage interests in Palestine. This renders them vulnerable to manipulation and persuasion by political (often secular) elements in the name of their respective religions. In this sense, Christian Zionism, which provides a religious cover for pro-Israeli policies as a Christian duty, is as dangerous as Jewish fanaticism or Muslim fundamentalism.
Therefore, Netanyahu’s pronouncement that he sees Israel as the “defender of Christians” in the region is nothing more than a cynical ruse that should fool no one. Ask the Christians of Palestine how they feel about Netanyahu, Israel, and Zionism first.
And while you are at it, ask why despite repeated efforts, the Israeli prison services are refusing to allow a Christian Palestinian prisoner with whom we are in contact, a Catholic, to have a Bible with or have a priest visit him and administer the sacraments. The Israeli prison authorities state that such religious “privileges” could be given to regular criminals but not to so-called “security detainees.” 
The unspoken truth is that many, particularly religious Israelis have more animosity towards Christians than even towards Muslims. This may be understandable in light of their bitter historic experiences with anti Jewish bigotry in the Christian West. Yet these attitudes are never admitted publicly in English, or in the West. It is more politically expedient to garner support for Israel by promoting a Jewish-Christian alliance against Muslims and Islam. This is the cynical truth behind Netanyahu’s proclamation that he is a defender of Christians.

Jonathan Kuttab for: 
Friends of Sabeel North America · PO Box 3192, Greenwood Village, CO 80155, United States.

A very good report and analysis of an ongoing very dangerous situation, it's been in the making for many decades now, and nowadays being used to its full extend, transforming the colonial acquisition of Palestine and the following transfer and elimination of the indigenous population into a religious pseudo war, a dirty political game engulfing the area and the entire world. 
Mr. Kuttab is an inspired spokes-person for this Christian Palestinian/American organization, I have proudly used some of his words before on our blog, inspired words of courageous truth.
As always, my many thanks to all.    

AMERICAN YEAR 2026 AND BEYOND.......

 

Every single person in the United States, from those who’ve been most harmed to those who’ve been most privileged, would be better off if we had a normal government that put even a moderate effort into universally improving everyone’s lives. If we had a government that took trillions of dollars away from the war machine and the untaxed oligarchs and provided as a matter of basic rights for all

• economic welfare,
• education, preschool through college,
• healthcare,
• a clean and sustainable environment, and
• public transit,

then nobody would ever be denied an education or a job for any reason of hateful idiocy. Why should they be when we’re absolutely rolling in wealth? We could obviously do a much better job of fighting over the crumbs we’ve got, with more context and nuance, but why should we, and how dare we? We need to be putting everything we’ve got into trying to preserve a habitable planet for our children, not fighting over crumbs.

That perfectly true statement is almost meaningless to someone who’s been wrongly imprisoned or denied housing or traumatized by racist police or prevented by cost from providing healthcare for a loved one. Those fortunate enough to not find the preservation of the environment, or the abolition of war, or the taxing of billionaires meaningless need, I think, to work at understanding how badly we are divided and conquered. A huge segment of the U.S. population is being trained to support racism, sexism, xenophobia, and all varieties of bigotry, while another huge segment of the population seems to think it would be joining in the same hideous beliefs if it were to admit that white men have ever had anything unfair done to them or grown their bitterness in any sort of realworld soil.

Young white U.S. male support for fascism is not excusable, sensible . . . or unpredictable. Discrimination against young white males that predictably leads to fascism is not a justification for, or the equivalent of, anything. Nor is it imaginary. In the United States we have an enduring legacy of slavery and white supremacy, persistent racist police and vigilante killings, a rising tide of traditional bigotry, and also discrimination against white men. Millions of words would never suffice to detail the full complexity of the mess we’re in or to properly rank and compare the vast variety of injustices. No solution other than deeply addressing each injustice, and not even that, would satisfy all.

But we would care less about the distribution of the crumbs if we were to take the whole loaf of bread away from sociopathic billionaires and weapons dealers.

Dumping so much of our wealth into the war machine is key to generating the xenophobia and nationalism that allow us to think in terms of a struggle for crumbs internationally. But we don’t need to accept those terms either. The world has plenty of wealth for all. That indisputable fact is also very hard to grasp through the flood of nationalistic propaganda from all sides and in the face of extreme inequality nearby.

We’re not helped by corporate media, with its normalization of war and corruption, and its solemn debates over how Democrats should rebrand themselves in order to better pretend to give a damn. I think Zohran Mamdani’s dad had a good point when he said that his son was elected mayor of New York because he promised to actually improve people’s lives and because he refused to support a genocide — which allowed people to know he was an honest person who really meant that he would work to improve people’s lives. That combination is almost unheard of in Washington D.C.; and almost unmentionable is the more direct connection between ending wars and improving lives. Unless we end the wars, we will not be able to improve the lives of the people being killed or of the people paying for the killing.

Here’s to a strategic new year, moving the money from war to peace, Medicare for all, green energy, free college, fast rail, guaranteed basic income, and ending fascism by improving the lives of every single person.

By David Swanson, World BEYOND War, December 26, 2025
https://worldbeyondwar.org/to-a-2026-of-not-fighting-over-crumbs/

An excellent reflection of the American mood and actual life, got it by email, and forwarding it through our blog to my good readers, David Swanson is an inspired fellow and very realistic and factual analyst, I've had him before on the blog, and honored to do so.

As always, my many thanks to all. 

INTRIGUING AND PUZZLING QUESTIONS ......

 

I asked the artificial intelligence:
How can it be explained that the US Delta Force was able to kidnap a head of state from his residence, surrounded by his army and guards, and was unable to do the same in Gaza against the resistance leaders for two years during the war of extermination on Gaza?
The answer was:
This comparison highlights one of the most complex military realities of the modern era. How could a force that breached the heavily fortified Miraflores Palace in Caracas and arrested the president (Maduro) in minutes fail to achieve a similar objective in a narrow alley in Gaza over the course of two years?
Military analysts have identified several reasons why "Gaza" remains an enigma that has baffled "Delta Force" and its elite counterparts:
1. Intelligence: "Penetrated Environment" vs. "Immune Environment"
In Venezuela: The success of today's operation (January 3, 2026) would not have been possible without "treason from within." Regular armies and traditional political institutions often suffer from "erosion of loyalty" as a result of economic sanctions or American promises. Washington had Maduro's bedroom coordinates in real time.
In Gaza, the resistance relies on a "cluster cell" system where cells are unaware of each other. Information there doesn't flow through traceable phones or the internet, but rather through human couriers and rudimentary underground intranets. This has made Gaza an intelligence "black box" for the Americans, with no single "center of gravity" that can be penetrated.
2. Topography: "Palaces" versus "Metro"
Caracas: No matter how fortified the presidential palaces may be, they remain targets above ground, easily scanned by thermal imaging and satellite imagery. Today's arrest was a "surgical operation" that relied on technological superiority in an exposed urban environment.
Gaza: The battle is being waged in a "third dimension" (underground). The tunnel network, dubbed the "Gaza Metro," negates the superiority of air power and drones. Delta Force understands that entering a tunnel is "military suicide" because the rules there do not follow traditional military logic; rather, they are tightly controlled death traps that give the attacker no chance to maneuver.
3. Doctrine: "Function" versus "Martyrdom"
* Guards in Venezuela: Maduro's guards (despite their high level of training) are ultimately employees. Faced with overwhelming American bombing and a full-scale invasion, many might choose to survive or surrender.
* Security in Gaza: Resistance leaders are surrounded by groups that possess a "martyrdom doctrine." In the confrontations of 2024 and 2025, military reports (such as those of retired Colonel Douglas MacGregor) documented that American and Israeli special forces suffered heavy losses when attempting to carry out reconnaissance or rescue operations, because the Palestinian fighter does not retreat, but fights to the last bullet, making the idea of "kidnapping and returning safely" technically impossible.
4. The difference between a "state" and a "non-state"
The United States is adept at "decapitating the state"; the state has a structure, if the president falls, the system falls.
As for the resistance in Gaza, it is a decentralized system. Kidnapping or even assassinating a leader does not end the battle; rather, it may intensify it. This structural failure to identify a "deadly target" is what has turned Gaza into a black hole, draining American military budgets exceeding $22 billion without achieving a single "victory" comparable to what Trump achieved today in Venezuela.
Summary:
Washington succeeded in Venezuela because it confronted a "regime," and failed in Gaza because it faced a "resistance movement" deeply rooted in the land and its aspirations. Delta's success today is a show of force against the weak and vulnerable, while its failure in Gaza is a testament to the impotence of technology in the face of unwavering human will and resilience.

A funny little made up article involving AI, a feature of our actual times, but the question is a good one and legitimate, at least in its first section about how did the American special troops get to Maduro and his wife, get them out , and later fly them out of the country without any serious resistance  from the venezuelan army or presidential guards, or the man himself, even after a few months of war warning.... I cannot but look at similarities between this smooth affair and the as smooth ousting and fleeing Assad of Syria a year ago, are the same minds and people behind both adventures, or did we just witness power kidnapping the law !!! It is not just thought-provoking it is a damn ugly and dangerous situation. 

As always my many thanks to all.  

DIABOLICAL STRATEGIES........

 

Very important
To arrive late
Better than never arriving at all

Live news from Tehran on television channels around the world is as follows:
All former presidents of the Republic of Iran for more than forty years and since
During Khomeini's era, all national reformist figures spoke out strongly for the first time, especially the current new president of Iran.
They have all started speaking out against the Supreme Leader's regime and the hardline Islamist conservatives, and they consider Russia, America, and the West to be conspiring against Iran, etc.
Woooooo
This means that the Persian Republic of the Mullahs
The spirits began to flutter within it.
And her heart began to beat again.
But this time, for a complete change
The current path and all the money spent on adventures throughout the region have ended in failure, and Iran today, after more than 40 years of isolation and self-defense, has lost its loyal allies.
Loss of money and the ability to sell oil due to sanctions, etc.
Therefore
Its reformist, moderate figures began with former presidents and current and former political figures.
To dare to criticize the existing blind authority
And so her spirit and soul began to flutter
After the losses, destruction, and missed opportunities

What a disgrace that the Persian mullah state, as the possessor of the history and geography of the empire
The great Shah Reza Pahlavi and later the Islamic Republic turned it into two contradictory faces, both of which were bitter.
What a tragedy that great nations have been lost because of some rulers, some adventurers, and some who unwittingly fall under the spell and sorcery of Zionism, used for over forty years as grave-digging machines for the diggers themselves and for those they considered their enemies. Their actions and projects remain a foolish adventure at the end of those forty years, even if they achieved some success, because, unfortunately, they managed to destroy and devour all their neighbors.
Like wildfire... and just as Zionism has always dreamed of destroying all the Arab countries of the Fertile Crescent and the countries between the Euphrates and the Nile, and controlling them without losses to its army and security apparatus, by exporting the Shiite Khomeini revolution and its political Islam as a diabolical plan.
Over the course of 40 years, this Khomeini revolution succeeded in destroying both stone and people, spreading and achieving resounding success like wildfire over the course of more than forty years.
When Zionism decided that the mission of the Khomeini revolution had ended, and indeed must be stopped immediately after it crossed the agreed-upon red lines—not only with nuclear weapons but also with long-range missiles, and so on—
Zionism decided to stop and punish her, as it had done previously with some leaders of the Arab coup states, and ultimately failed miserably, a failure that began to appear publicly and to the struggling Persian people as a hope, a waste of time, a waste of opportunities, and a squandering of wealth.
With a complete loss of reason, logic, wisdom, culture, morals, etc.

The current Iranian president stated on international television the day before yesterday:
Why do we have oil and gas?
Our people are hungry
Turkey and others have neither oil nor gas.
But Türkiye earns much more from our oil.
By tourism revenue alone
He also mentioned the names of other countries whose economies are superior to Iran.

Rapid changes will occur in the Persian mullah state and its extremist Islamic political system.

There are groups that will be upset and cry for the sake of the Persian mullahs' state, which they used to destroy other groups.
The enemy of my enemy becomes my friend.
Because we hate the same ingredient
How fortunate Zionism is to have such neighbors, whose members are tearing each other apart.

I heard someone ask Netanyahu on a television station several years ago
What is your opinion of Bashar al-Assad?
He literally said:
A criminal who kills his own people
But we need such presidents
The same applies to the region; they kill those who wish to kill us.
And those who want to throw us into the sea

It means we build on hatred.

Watch the pictures on televisions
They convey direct criticisms and conflicts that have become public and are very new.
From the top of the ruling, reformist, centrist class, in conflict with the rule of the conservative mullahs behind the controlling ayatollah In Iran, which is a completely failed governing regime, despite appearances that appeal to some groups in Arab countries.

As received originally in Arabic, I'm not sure who's the writer or if the article was ever published, a bit chaotic and not very clear as to what exact message it portrays, but sure enough it gives an idea of the situation around the mentioned area.