Dominique EddĂ©, Lebanese writer: “Benyamin Netanyahu has taken time hostage”
TRIBUNE
Dominique Edde
Novelist and essayist
The novelist explains, in a column in "Le Monde", that Israel's "military intoxication" and the project supported by its prime minister are doomed to failure. She calls on Western powers to stop following it blindly.
The United States supported the unbearable for a year: the methodical destruction of Gaza, life after life, house after house, as a logical response to the bloody madness of October 7, 2023. Everything was destroyed: schools, hospitals, refugee camps, mosques, churches, archaeological sites, cemeteries. And while tens of thousands of children were amputated, orphaned, reduced to dust, while Israeli hostages languished under the bombs, we were asked to understand that it was not over, to the extent that Hamas still exists.
Now, it is here, in Lebanon, that Israel is sowing death without counting, under the pretext of finishing off Hezbollah. But what have we witnessed, after eleven months of carnage, in recent weeks? An endless series of liquidations of political and military leaders of Hamas and Hezbollah. One, Ismail Haniyeh, political leader of Hamas, the same one who negotiated the ceasefire in Gaza, was blown up in his hotel room in Tehran; the other, Fouad Chokr, the senior commander of Hezbollah, as he briefly entered his office in the southern suburbs of Beirut. Everything happened and wrapped up in a second, in defiance, of course, of the dozens of dead and hundreds of wounded among the civilian population. The other leaders were killed or disabled en masse, during the spectacular explosion of thousands of wireless communication devices.
Some cried miracle. They were at the cinema while others were in the hospital. This is to say that the Mossad [Israeli foreign intelligence service] lives up to its fearsome reputation. This is to say that it can kill whenever it wants, wherever it wants. This is to say that we are entitled to wonder about the reasons why the Netanyahu regime preferred to annihilate the civilian population of Gaza and continue the annexation of the West Bank, before taking the life of its best enemy: the military leader of Hamas, who has also become political leader, Yahya Sinwar. The goal is increasingly clear: to do everything to maintain and save the caricature, to deport the question of Palestine, in order to better liquidate it, to transform it into a conflict between whites and bearded men, so that the West has no other option but to follow blindly. To form a block with the wall.
Benjamin Netanyahu has taken time hostage. And this time is our common destiny that he manipulates and maneuvers with infernal bad faith. All these hours of anguish, all these stopped hours, are the same for the survivors of Gaza, for the Israeli hostages, for the inhabitants of northern Israel, southern Lebanon, Beirut and the Bekaa, for Jews, Christians, Muslims, and perhaps even more for those who are content with humanism to face death. Time has the same name in Arabic and Hebrew: zaman.
Time took a massive blow in 1948, with the creation of the State of Israel in Palestine, which came at the cost of a people: the people of Palestine. This creation took place at a time in history that was still very much imbued, on the European level, with the colonial thinking according to which some peoples are more civilized than others. It is hard to believe that the Western powers are indefinitely delaying the moment to mourn this, the moment to say stop. Stop, to save what remains to be saved. To stop the arms deliveries. To demand an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, which would also silence the guns of Hezbollah. Who can believe for a second that Israel's security comes from its military intoxication, from its determination to demolish and spread hatred?
Reproduce the impasse in a worse way
Let us return to the heart of the matter, by a brief return to the past. The fundamental problem that the Zionist project covered was not only, far from it, that of the sharing of space, it was that of the cohabitation of times. It was the explosive encounter of two times with fundamentally different memories, reference points and projects. The Arab population, on the spot, was then in search of emancipation. The other, essentially European, immigrated to Palestine, in order to build a country there from scratch, for a people barely emerged from the hell of the camps for which this same Europe was responsible.
It was the first state in the region to associate religious identity, even within a secular project, with national identity. The confrontation was inevitable. In his book The State of Israel Against the Jews (La DĂ©couverte, 2020), Sylvain Cypel quotes the phrase attributed to Israeli general Rafael Eitan: “I do not believe in peace with the Arabs. Because if they had done to me a tenth of what we did to them, I would never agree to make peace.” These words echo those of the military man Moshe Dayan who declared, sixty-eight years ago, on the grave of a young Israeli murdered by a Palestinian: “Let us not accuse the murderers. How could we blame the hatred they have for us?” For eight years, they have been vegetating in a refugee camp in Gaza, and we, before their eyes, are transforming into our property the lands and villages where they and their ancestors lived.
The time that followed was used to nibble, to tack on, to maintain the insoluble instead of serving to repair and build. It has not ceased to reproduce the impasse in worse. And to give birth, with it, to miserable little short times with benefits without a future and projects without vision. Today, this sick time is in the hands of a messianic extreme right that wants to make it achieve in a quarter of an hour what seventy-five years have not succeeded in accomplishing: the dreamed disappearance of the Palestinian people by the partisans of "Greater Israel". If its regime were alone in maintaining this delirium, we would be able to perceive its end. The tragedy lies, I repeat, in the unwavering support it receives from the American government. As for Europe, with the exception of Ireland, Spain, Norway and Belgium, it renounces international law, goes round in circles and persists in what it does worst: abstention.
And Iran and the Islamic fundamentalists, I will be told, do they not have their share of this stranglehold on time? Yes, of course! But, precisely, they are in another time. The time of the watch is all the same to them. They do not advocate democracy or a political model that respects freedoms. They live in a time that can wait. A time that we do not want, obviously, but which we must take into account if we want history to dislodge them one day. To challenge this enemy is not to tear it away like a radish from its land, it will grow back, it is to actively work to remove one by one its reasons for posing as a resistance movement. It is to make peace. We all know that by demanding the disappearance of Israel, the Islamists are raising the stakes. Double-speak is the ABC of political language in this conflict. Recent events have clearly shown that Iran, no more than Hezbollah, wants a regional war. They have been calling for a ceasefire in Gaza for months to put down their weapons. What are we waiting for to activate it?
The day our species regains its senses
It is up to the Israelis to wake up before it is too late. The outcome – life or death – is in the hands of their leaders. How many want a homeland for the Palestinians? How many are for, how many are against, the continuation of the annexation of the West Bank after the destruction of Gaza? What do the majority of them hope for, who are in favor of continuing the war? A state for the Jews according to the initial plan or a Jewish state according to Netanyahu? The first scenario now requires a renewed vision, a change of direction, a spirit of openness. The second is neither morally defensible nor politically viable. It would involve, among other things, the expulsion or ostracization of nearly 25% of non-Jewish Israeli citizens. The fundamental question is therefore this: what do Israelis want for themselves in the future?
As for the Arab world, it is more pathetic than ever. Largely confiscated, at the present time, by Islamic fundamentalism and its internal struggles, it remains to be reinvented at the end of a century of violent defeats. What is certain is that the silence of most of its leaders in the face of the ongoing ignominy is a shame that, in the long term, risks degenerating into madness among the people who suffer it. On both sides, the cowardice of the powerful is about to create hurricanes of rage. All destinies are now linked, with the common threat and promise: time. Each day of indulgence for war is one day too many for the survival of all.
The day our species regains its reason, when emergency measures have been taken for all, only a utopia will get all these populations out of the bloody rut they find themselves in. This utopia, as its name indicates, is not for tomorrow. It implies a fundamental change in the relationship to the past, to the future, to the other. Politics, in order to survive, now demands the loftiness of an astronomer and the austerity of a monk. It is a metaphysical transformation, based on the few that we are, accompanied by practical provisions, which will open the doors of the prison and put human intelligence in a position to deal with the artificial, without being its plaything or slave.
Among the concrete measures: a new egalitarian conception of citizenship that will relegate all religious affiliations to the domain of private life. And why not? Since we are in the domain of a reality revised from A to Z, a confederation of states with defined and open borders, where the individual will not feel forced to kill in order to conceive of his survival. A friend had called it "USS", "United Semitic States". While waiting for this distant day, the only one worth dreaming of, we must now continue to endure the nightmare.
I received this good article by e-mail from a good French friend, and thought of forwarding it through our blog to all my good readers, the translation to English comes via Google and myself.
As always, my profound thanks to all, stay safe and well.