Why is it always the West in general and the U.S. specifically the only ones accused and blamed for their aggressions , Neoconism and their political philosophies of regime change , as well as their colonialism . It is true that their policies toward the world , had and still are mostly directed under the auspices of all of the above . But to be honest , so are every political entity and country all over the world , industrial , rich or poor .
Similar tendencies for aggressions and hegemony , for stealing the wealth and lands of neighbors , for dominating their populations , existed and continue to be until today , Russia and before it the Soviet Union , Israel , Japan of the first half of the 20th century , Iran and lately China , and of course many others . They all had their fair share of colonialism , Neoconism , apartheid behaviors , and all had their hands at regime change , when it was convenient to their policies and leaders .
Eastern Europe , Afghanistan , Georgia , Ukraine and Syria , as it was in Iraq , Yemen or Libya , are but few vivid examples of our adventures .So is it a normal shared human affair , a human genes defect a simple love of expansion when feeling strong and able ?? Surely , It is not a monopoly of the West, nor an American exclusivity , although one has to admit , that the U.S. excelled at the game as did the Europeans before them .
Almost two and a half centuries ago , modern America was forged , to reach and become the leading , and the most powerful country in the world , with an unmatched vitality in all aspects . This same America is lately accused and criticized simultaneously for two opposing stands , relating to the situation in Syria . Hated for one side while heavily criticized for the other . Hated for not pursuing a regime change , or even a full invasion of Syria at some point , and not establishing "no fly zones".
I know of so many Syrians and Americans , as well as most media analysts , criticizing the Obama administration for not toppling Bashar Assad , and not getting seriously involved in Syria , and having no clear policy vis a vis the Syrian regime and its army , while simultaneously criticizing Hillary Clinton during her tenure as Secretary Of State or now as the presidential nominee , for her hawkish approach to foreign affairs , her Neocone's partnerships and regime change philosophies , even for her willingness to create "no fly zones in Syria".
Until recently most people criticized the American ill adventured invasion of Iraq during the Bush era , and the aftermath policies at the hands of totally incompetent American governors . Mr. Obama who practically removed most American troops and presence from Iraq , is still heavily criticized and blamed today by some prominent opposing politicians for not supporting a meaningful surge of American troops in both Iraq and Syria , insinuating that it's the real reason for all the chaos in the area . All to say ; how divided opinions are and how non objective political differences and practices could be , and how biased most columnists, politicians , their readers and followers are .
My gratitude for your time and attention , as well as your help spreading the word .
No comments:
Post a Comment