Thursday, July 23, 2026

MEN SIXTY FIVE AND OVER ......

 

by Carole Chelhot


Men aged sixty and over almost all have one thing in common: they suddenly discover an irresistible charm. Whether they still have a full head of hair or a skillfully polished bald head, naturally white hair or heroically blackened hair, a proudly protruding belly or a falsely flat stomach, they are chronic nostalgics convinced they have a right to renewed youth.

They are generally married, of course. But be careful: they no longer truly live with their spouses. They "cohabitate." A crucial distinction.

They coexist for the sake of their offsprings, who are now over thirty, have earned two degrees, received three vaccinations, have a job, a spouse, a bank loan, and sometimes even produced their own children. But the self-sacrificing father remains in the marital home to preserve the emotional stability of these poor, vaccinated, married, and, moreover, employed young adults.

As for their wives, they are always described in particularly touching terms. Either she is "a wonderful person," which usually means he hasn't spoken to her in fifteen years. Or she is "like a sister," a slightly unsettling phrase after thirty-five years of marriage. Or she "lives her own life," meaning she prepares dinner, manages the household, pays the bills, entertains guests, renews his prescriptions, and reminds him of his cardiology appointment.

Some wives are still officially in office. Others have already publicly resigned, but continue to provide the bare minimum service: household maintenance, administration, meals, pharmacy, public relations and maintaining appearances at weddings, baptisms and funerals.

The man, for his part, decided to take control of his life.

So we find him at the gym, squeezed into an outrageously expensive technical outfit, sweating with dignity to awaken some lazy muscles that had been peacefully sleeping since 1987. He lifts a dumbbell, discreetly observes his reflection, changes angle, contracts his arm and desperately seeks the biceps his trainer promised.

He doesn't sweat: he "eliminates toxins".

He is not suffering: he is "pushing his limits".

He's not short of breath: he's "working on his cardio".

Between sets of three movements, he checks his phone, replies to a message, smooths down his hair if there's any left, then allows himself a long break intended, it seems, for muscle recovery. The muscle, exhausted from being used for forty-five seconds, does indeed require twenty minutes of rest.

His personal trainer, a young man with disproportionately large shoulders, assures him that the results are coming. They're coming slowly, admittedly, but they're coming. Somewhere!

Our sixty-year-old seducer also follows an extremely strict diet. In the morning: seeds, unsweetened yogurt, egg white, and warm lemon water. At midday: grilled chicken, steamed vegetables, and three almonds counted with notary-like precision.

In the evening, however, circumstances become more complex.

A business dinner, an unexpected invitation, a birthday, a visiting friend: all these are unforeseen circumstances that justify red meat, fries, dessert, and a digestif. He's not cheating on his diet. He's simply demonstrating metabolic flexibility.

Then comes the cigar.

Because the sixty-year-old man who has just spent two hours monitoring his cholesterol and counting his protein intake considers it perfectly logical to end the evening with a sizable cigar. Cigars are obviously not a bad habit. They represent a way of life, a symbol of maturity, a virile ritual accompanied by a cognac he drinks purely "for the taste."

He then poses, cigar in hand, watch clearly visible, eyes slightly squinting, as if he had just concluded an international agreement when he had only ordered the bill.

Then all it takes is for a woman to give him a polite smile for him to feel entrusted with a mission. He straightens his back, tucks in his rounded belly, and deploys his charm disguised as intellectual conversation.

He never flirts, of course.

He "appreciates pleasant encounters".

He's not courting you: he admires your intelligence.

He is not looking for anything at all: he only wants to "enjoy life", "share good times" and "stay surrounded by positive people".

Then come the subtly outdated compliments, the youthful anecdotes, the unverifiable sporting achievements, and the photograph taken twenty-five years earlier, presented as dating from "a few years ago."

According to him, he has known all women, frequented all places, refused all opportunities and left all those who, curiously, seem to ignore his existence today.

He explains that he's different from men his age. More modern. More open-minded. Younger at heart. He's mostly young at heart because the rest of his body refused to cooperate.

And then, they are all victims of something. Victims of a marriage that has become "complicated", of a wife who "no longer understands them", of adult children who mysteriously prevent them from rebuilding their lives, or simply of a cruel fate that has imposed thirty years of marital comfort on them.

They are all at a crossroads. Some have been there for ten years, with the engine running, the turn signal on, and absolutely no intention of turning.

They dream of changing their lives, but certainly not their wives. After thirty years of marriage, that's simply not done. You don't leave a faithful, organized, reassuring wife who is perfectly skilled at managing the household, medications, and meals. You're simply looking for a brief interlude elsewhere, a chance to lighten the load of life.

A brief affair, they explain gravely, could help them "find themselves," "reconnect with themselves," and become more fulfilled men. Almost a therapeutic approach. A prescription without a doctor, but with mandatory discretion.

The next day, they will return home, sit down at the table, and ask their wives what's for lunch. Because the goal is certainly not to disrupt the family balance. It's simply to add a little personal fulfillment between cardiology appointments.

So, even after sixty, some men don't age. They simply become teenagers with a luxury watch, a gym membership, a nutrition coach, a Cuban cigar, monitored blood pressure, and a wife waiting for them at home with their dinner, their medication, and the resigned patience of a woman who has long known the difference between genuine charm and a medically prescribed youthful crisis.

Ultimately, they want neither to leave, nor to choose, nor to give up. They only want to keep the woman who organizes their life and seduce those who give them the illusion that it has only just begun.

Except that women have long since discovered their secret. They smile at them, watch them bustle about, let them play the eternal young leading men… before escorting them back, with infinite tenderness, to their beloved wives!

Ahhhh, sexagenarians, a little seriousness, please!

Ha ha ha, amazing details with humor, it applies nicely to most couples after aging and many years of companionship. forwarded to me originally in French by a friend, I don't know the author or if it was meant for publishing or actually published somewhere, but I found it excellent fitting our blog , more so for those elderly aging gracefully couples. 

As always, my many thanks to all.  

Saturday, July 18, 2026

THE VICEROY OF VENEZUELA ......

 

In the early hours of Jan. 3, shortly after U.S. commandos snatched Nicolás Maduro, the president of Venezuela, from his bedroom in a daring nighttime raid, Secretary of State Marco Rubio called Delcy Rodríguez, Venezuela’s vice president. Speaking in Spanish, he told her she faced a choice: work with the United States or experience an escalating attack on her country’s infrastructure, military bases and senior officials. After some negotiation, Rodríguez bent the knee.

In the months since, my colleagues Tyler Pager and Anatoly Kurmanaev report, Rubio has emerged as Venezuela’s de facto viceroy, a kind of heir to the powerful governors who once ruled the domains of the Spanish Empire, including the territory that is now Venezuela.

Rubio has effective control of Venezuela’s finances, its natural resources and its government, Tyler and Anatoly discovered after speaking with a dozen officials in Washington and Caracas. He is closely involved in the day-to-day operations of the country, and he remains in close contact with Rodríguez, who now runs Venezuela on an acting basis with the blessing of the United States.

He has weighed in personally on her governmental appointments, such as the minister of defense. He asserts control over her public appearances and statements. He successfully encouraged her to remove Maduro’s family and business partners from positions of power, and inveighed upon her officials to provide intelligence that allowed the U.S. military to kill one of the leaders of the gang Tren de Aragua. They trade gossip and selfies over text message.

It’s no buddy movie, though. The relationship between Rubio and Rodríguez, the reporters write, “is a manifestation of Trump-era American power, in which the winner takes all regardless of sovereignty and international law.”

Then they illustrated that power in a single, amazing paragraph:

The U.S. Treasury receives the revenue from most of Venezuela’s exports, then disburses it to Venezuela through the country’s banking system, a relationship akin to parents handing out allowances to children. Mr. Rubio and his team set the conditions on what that money can be spent on, and by whom.

Seeking permission

Rubio has said that the Trump administration’s plan for Venezuela has three stages: Recover the economy, stabilize the country and transition it to democracy.

Before last month’s earthquakes, the administration said it was in the second stage, and trying to bring international investment into Venezuela. To move the effort along, senior Trump officials went to Venezuela to meet with Rodríguez’s administration and strike energy and mining deals.

Tyler and Anatoly have a great story about one of those visits. In March, Doug Burgum, the interior secretary, met with Rodríguez at the presidential palace in Caracas. Rubio texted her during the visit to ask how it was going. Very well, she responded.

I’ll let the reporters take it from there:

But the meeting was overshadowed by damaging news. Reuters reported that day that the Justice Department was quietly building a legal case against Ms. Rodríguez.

Ms. Rodríguez’s administration was shocked, and sought clarification from the White House. To allay Ms. Rodríguez’s concerns, Todd Blanche, then the deputy attorney general, called the report “completely FALSE.”

But the Venezuelan government sought further assurances. So the next day Mr. Rubio texted Mr. Rodríguez the link to a social media post from the U.S. president.

“Delcy Rodríguez, who is the President of Venezuela, is doing a great job, and working with U.S. Representatives very well,” Mr. Trump wrote. Ms. Rodríguez was pleased, and wanted to thank Mr. Trump with a post of her own. But first, she shared the draft with Mr. Rubio. She posted it after receiving his approval.

A daring and very explicit article by the NY Times about the real situation nowadays between the US and the new regime in Venezuela, after the kidnaping of its ex-president Maduro, who is still in American custody with his wife with no specific charges or court hearing, received by email and forwarding it through our blog for a better understanding of this comic situation and its ramifications.

As always, my many thanks to all.   

Monday, July 13, 2026

OUR BEST ALLIES .......

 

US Democratic Representative Ro Khanna announced that he was detained by Israeli settlers armed with American-made rifles during a recent visit to the West Bank, describing the trip as an opportunity to witness firsthand the devastating impact of the Israeli occupation on human life. This comes as Khanna considers a presidential run in 2028. Speaking to Reuters on Thursday from a Palestinian village, Khanna said that settlers carrying M-4 rifles surrounded the van he was traveling in the previous day during a tour of an area in the southern West Bank where residents are frequently attacked by settlers. The California congressman added , "We were in a village that Israeli settlers destroyed ... They destroyed the school, they destroyed that village, and we were just checking on that."
He continued, "Then these criminals came with M4 rifles, which are American-made, and detained us. They blocked the road. Then they called the Israeli army, and the Israeli army sided with them, not with the Americans."


Cameron Kaski, one of Khanna's aides who was with the group, said they were held for over an hour and pleaded with the American embassy in Jerusalem for help. 

Kaski added that a group of officers, who appeared to be police, eventually intervened, leading to their release.

For its part, the Israeli army explained that army and police forces intervened after receiving a report that settlers were blocking the road for vehicles near Khirbet Zanuta, a small Palestinian village whose residents were forcibly displaced following violent settler attacks after Hamas attacks on Israel in 2003.

The army stated, "Upon arrival, the forces dispersed the Israeli civilians and allowed the vehicles to proceed.


on Saturday, with the Palestinian news agency WAFA reporting that a Palestinian man was shot in the leg, two others were wounded by rubber-coated bullets, and a ten-year-old boy was injured in the head by a stun grenade during an attack by Israeli army forces and settlers on a house in the village of Al-Mughayyir, east of Ramallah .

In response, security sources told the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth that "Israeli army forces arrived in the village following a report from a shepherd that Palestinians were throwing stones at them and setting fires in the area. During the clash, the forces fired shots into the air and then at one of the stone-throwing rioters." 

A rift has emerged among Democrats as Khanna becomes the second Democratic presidential
candidate to visit the region this week. In Tel Aviv on Wednesday, Rahm Emanuel, who served as White House chief of staff under former President Barack Obama , said that Israeli policies toward the Palestinians are undermining support for the U.S.-Israel alliance. 

When asked if he was considering a presidential run, Khanna said, "I am seriously considering it, and I am more inclined to do so after this visit." Israeli policies toward the Palestinians have become a major divisive issue within the Democratic Party ahead of the U.S. midterm elections in November, and have contributed to the primary defeats of some current Democratic representatives by left-wing rivals who accused them of supporting the right-wing Israeli government. A Reuters/Ipsos poll showed that support for Israel among Democrats has fallen from 59 percent in 2018 to 22 percent in May. Although Israel has historically enjoyed strong bipartisan support in the United States , a growing number of Democrats in Congress are calling for a halt to US military aid to Israel. This aid, valued at $3.8 billion annually, includes funding for small arms such as M4 rifles and missile defense systems, which Israel used during its war with Iran

During a visit to an area overlooking a valley dotted with settlements on the outskirts of the town of Turmus Ayya, home to thousands of Palestinians who also hold US citizenship, Khanna said he believes his party's leadership "doesn't grasp the magnitude of the moral test that the issues of Palestine , Gaza, and Israel have become." Khanna noted that he deliberately limited his visit to the West Bank and ensured that its meetings and programs were organized by Palestinians, aiming to gain an unbiased view of the territories Israel seized in the 1967 war. He added, "If you are not prepared to defend the human rights of Palestinians, if you are not prepared to condemn the genocide in Gaza and the apartheid regime in the West Bank, then your moral standing is questionable." 

Israel rejects accusations that it committed genocide in Gaza or that it imposes an apartheid regime in the West Bank, home to some three million Palestinians and about 500,000 Jewish settlers. Most of the world and the United Nations consider Israeli settlements in the West Bank illegal under international law, based on the Fourth Geneva Convention, which prohibits the transfer of civilian populations into occupied territory. Israel, however, rejects this position, arguing that the West Bank is disputed territory with a Jewish presence dating back thousands of years. Palestinians, for their part, see the West Bank, along with Gaza and East Jerusalem , as part of their future state. Support for Israel remains strong among Republicans, although some within President Donald Trump 's political coalition have expressed reservations.

A good report looking at the dire situation within the occupied Palestinian territories, the settlers barbaric brutality, backed by the Israeli armed forces and police, plus the full apartheid being exercised on daily basis against the original Palestinians. this article was translated and inspired and copied from the leading Lebanese newspaper Annahar, while the news has spread all over the media.  

As always, my profound many thanks to all.   

Friday, July 10, 2026

A HINT OF WHAT'S COMING ......

 

The website "Arabi 21" stated that the Israeli writer and academic Eyal Zisser said in an article published in the newspaper "IsraelToday,” the talk about approaching Lebanon and Israel's new political understandings are still premature," he said, adding that "any declaration of principles between the two sides could meet the same fate as the May 17, 1983 agreement if practical steps are not taken to address the existing challenges on the ground."

Zisser added that "the Lebanese government's willingness to sign a document of principles that includes a commitment to move towards a peace agreement with Israel represents, in his view, a remarkable development, especially in light of what he described as the decline in influence of Hezbollah"Compared to previous phases in which the concepts of 'peace' and 'normalization' were absent from Lebanese political discourse."

He considered that "the document of principles does not rise to the level of an actual peace agreement, but remains within the framework of a declaration of intent that needs practical translation on the ground," and he believed that "the real challenge lies in the implementation mechanisms and not in political statements or declared pledges.


Zisser pointed out that "the importance of the declaration, if it goes ahead, lies in its ability to separate the Lebanese track from the ongoing negotiations between the US and Iran, and preventing Tehran from maintaining direct influence in determining the future of the Lebanese arena.”

He criticized what he described as an attempt by American Vice President J.D. Vance linked the Lebanese file to the understandings with IranHe argued that "such a trend gives Tehran an influential role in Lebanon and gives Hezbollah an opportunity to regain its strength, which could hinder the Lebanese government's efforts to rebuild state institutions free from Iranian influence.


According to Zisser, "intervention by American Foreign Minister Marco Rubio, in coordination with Lebanon and Israel, helped avert this scenario, and also allowed Tel Aviv to maintain its military presence in South Lebanon In accordance with its security requirements.”

Despite this, the writer emphasized that “what is happening so far does not go beyond the framework of non-binding political documents,” recalling the May 17, 1983 agreement, which stipulated ending the state of war between the two parties, respecting the borders, and the withdrawal of forces. In exchange for Israeli commitment to Lebanon that was obligated to prevent any operations against Israel launched from Lebanese territory.”

He explained that “the agreement did not last long due to the weakness of the Lebanese state at the time and its inability to fulfill its commitments, in addition to the Syrian role in obstructing the agreement and the withdrawal of the United States from the Lebanese scene after its forces were subjected to deadly attacks claimed by Hezbollah, which ultimately led to the cancellation of the agreement in 1984.”

Zisser pointed out that “Hezbollah is betting today on a repeat of this scenario, considering that the fate of any new understandings may be similar if the party remains a major player on the Lebanese domestic scene.”

He concluded by saying that “the success of any future political process between Lebanon and Israel requires, in his view, preventing Hezbollah from regaining its capabilities and reducing Iranian influence in parallel with supporting Lebanese state institutions and strengthening their role, he warned that ignoring the lessons of the past could lead to a reproduction of the failures of previous experiences.

As received in Arabic, translated to fit our blog, for better understanding of the situation between Lebanon and Israel nowadays, more so in light of the escalation taking shape on the ground as more players are being dragged into the game, as in Turkey and possibly Egypt as well as Syria, which will somehow worsen the situation for Lebanon, the weaker link in the area.

As always, my many thanks to all. 

Friday, July 3, 2026

A GOOD AND FAIR ANALYSIS.....

 
In response to a recent video criticizing Tucker Carlson, Mujahid Sarsur, author of the forthcoming book, Palestinians at the Holocaust Museum, writes:

I believe the efforts of pro-Palestinian human rights liberal Jews (including you, Michelle Goldberg, and Naomi Klein) to contribute to the Democratic/Republican establishment goal of dismissing Carlson as a bigot are extremely harmful to the Palestinian cause, and I believe such efforts, although primarily justified by focusing on Carlson’s statements that may be perceived as bigoted, partly stem from a need to defend a construct of a “Jewish peoplehood”—a construct which has been substantially shaped not by traditional Jewish ethics, but by the Zionist movement’s ethnocentric influence on the Jewish community.

My deeper point is illuminated by coining the term “anti-Zionist Zionist Jews”: a person who does not believe in the need for a Jewish state but still embraces the ideological structures underlying Zionism, wanting to defend and be part of a “Jewish peoplehood,” and unwilling to look at the link between that construct and the extermination of Palestinians.

The Palestine issue cannot be understood without a deep exploration of Jewish identity; few questions are more relevant to the Palestinians than “Who is a Jew?” In my upcoming book, I rely on the writings of Jewish and Israeli authors who illustrate how Zionism is ideologically dependent on the construct of “Jewish peoplehood” and who argue that Jews are no more than a faith group, to show how this construct is existentially linked to the future of Palestinians:

The concept of the Jewish people has been at the center of Zionist ideology and what it did to the Palestinians. Israeli intellectual Boaz Evron argues that “the problematic situation in which modern Israel finds itself is derived, inter alia, from assumptions and ideologies about the nature of the Jewish people and the Jewish state that have largely been refuted by historical developments.” Israeli historian Shlomo Sand writes that Israel’s attachment to an “unbridled ethnocracy that grossly discriminates against certain of its citizens, rests on the active myth of an eternal nation that must ultimately forgather in its ancestral land.” Professor of Jewish history, Yakov Rabkin, writes that what “underlies Zionist ideology” is “the concept of the Jewish people.” Israeli government policies vis-à-vis the Palestinians have always been about how to defend this “Jewish peoplehood” and whatever the definition of that peoplehood encompasses.

Indeed, Jewish identity does not only concern the Palestinians, but it is also existentially relevant to them. The Nakba—the destruction of over 500 Palestinian towns and villages and the expulsion of 750,000 Palestinian refugees—was a direct result of this vision of Jewish peoplehood that needs to be preserved and protected. The Gaza genocide was rationalized and justified by Israel and its supporters by the need to protect the “Jewish people.” When Israel commenced its genocide, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken came to Israel and explicitly cited his Jewishness to explain why he feels personally required to support Israel and its military.

By equating genocide with Jewishness, as the American Jewish establishment wants him to do, Carlson is challenging the essence of why Antony Blinken may not be a practicing Jew but feels part of a “Jewish peoplehood.” By extension, Carlson is also challenging you, Peter, and Goldberg and Klein to reflect on the essence of contemporary Jewishness. You are confronted with a choice: the easy route of dismissing him as a bigot or asking tough questions. What does it mean that the majority of synagogues and Jewish community centers have Israeli flags? What does the removal of these flags entail? How much of contemporary Jewishness is left without Zionism? Why do many American Jews insist on Jewishness as an “ethnicity” even though ample books have collapsed that idea? Why would 540 Columbia students feel a need to call themselves Zionists and defend Israel in the midst of the genocide?

Many in the Palestinian community view the Carlson phenomenon as miraculous because, for the first time, they see in Carlson the possibility that the structures that have been leading to the expulsion and extermination of Palestinians are being fundamentally challenged. Carlson is holding a sledgehammer and is destroying these structures. Dismissing him as a bigot helps stop this sledgehammer and, from the vantage point of many Palestinians, feels like a deeply Zionist act.

This is, of course, not to accept Carlson’s other views, but to focus on his impact on the Palestine issue as well as the Lebanese situation.

A brilliant analysis, by this Palestinian author, addressed to Peter Beinart, who published it under his very interesting site "The Beinart notebook", which I get by email myself, I'm forwarding it through our blog for better understanding of the original issue and causes of the Israeli/Palestinian dilemma.
As always my deep many thanks to all.