Monday, October 16, 2023

A loud surprise about Gaza...

 


A loud surprise about Gaza... very shocking news, and this is what happened before October 7!

 The expert on weapons of mass destruction Akram Sriwi, revealed that the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. was aware of the preparations in advanced agitation (Attack), To cross the fence and carry out an operation, and there were alerts he received from intelligence services and other sources.

Sriwi added that the Mossad announced to the Israeli press that it had several indications of readiness and preparedness to carry out the operation. “On the other hand,...agitation. It conducted numerous exercises on crossing the fence and opening gaps in it, and this was under the eyes of the Israeli army, which monitors all the movements of the Palestinian resistance inside the Gaza Strip, through surveillance cameras, monitoring devices, and agents. Therefore, the Israeli leadership did not expect an operation "agitation“. It is either naivety on the part of the Israeli leaders, or neglect and misjudgment of the facts. In both cases, the operation proved a success for the Palestinian resistance and a miserable failure for the Israelis.”
 
And about the reasons for Netanyahu not taking the necessary measures to confront the expected operation. Sariwi told “Lebanon 24”  that “Netanyahu may have concealed his knowledge of this for several reasons, including that he was deceived by the size and type of the operation, as he believed that it would be within narrow limits and much less than those carried out with regular”agitation".

The main reason behind Netanyahu concealing his knowledge of the operation is that he wanted to exploit it to re-float himself as the head of power, and remove the danger that existed around his political future, especially since the fate of his government was at stake, due to the sharp division that afflicted Israeli society in the recent period, and after accusations of corruption. Which were directed against him, and thousands went out in demonstrations demanding his resignation and the overthrow of his government, and the demonstrators accused him of corruption, racism, and attempting a coup against the judiciary and the law. Therefore, Netanyahu wanted to use the timing of the operation to serve his survival in power, and serve his personal interests and deceived his people, especially since the Israeli public atmosphere was on the verge of overthrowing his government and the judiciary. Plus the fact that everyone in Israel doubted his political future.

 Now everyone has forgotten Netanyahu’s corruption, and has rallied around him in the process of taking revenge on Gaza. He is exploiting the feelings of the Israelis and trying to incite their emotions with resonant speeches, threats, and threats of annihilation, and population  transfer to other Arab countries. Thus, Netanyahu succeeded in uniting the Israelis and making them forget their desire to exclude him.
 
Sriwi continued: “In the near future, all the details will be exposed, and Netanyahu’s papers and prior knowledge of the operation will be revealed, and the Israelis will know that they are victims of the ambitions, selfishness, and personal interests of their leaders, and what is worse than that is the Israeli government’s lack of interest now in the lives of the prisoners held by the Hamas resistance group. The Israeli regime is ready to sacrifice and kill them so that they do not constitute a pressure card in the planned war. All of this will expose Netanyahu to trial in the future, and he may face imprisonment.”
 
Biden receives a warning
 
For its part, CNN reported on Friday night, citing undisclosed sources, that the intelligence community in the United States issued at least two assessments in  which the US President’s administration warned...Joe Biden Of increasing danger in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.

The network said that the two assessments were based partly on intelligence information it was provided from Israel. They came to the Biden administration weeks before the sudden and unprecedented attack On October 7, according to what the network said were sources familiar with this information.

One of the two assessments, dated September 28 and based on multiple intelligence sources, warned that an attack was imminent and it intended to escalate by launching missiles at Israel. 

On October 5, a CIA cable warned of the increasing potential for violence by...the resistance. 

But neither of the two American assessments presented any tactical details or indications of a massive and widespread attack, as occurred on the morning of October 7.

 “And I think what happened was that everyone saw these reports, and they said, ‘Yes, of course, but we know what it will look like.’” The American news network says that the assessments were among high-level warnings that reached the Biden administration by American intelligence and its allies in the Middle East during the past year.

This report was copied from a serious and respectable news site called "Lebanon 24" published on Oct-14-23, No name of any author.

A good report of a strong possibility of a whole and fully premeditated plan, a plan using absolute barbarity and brutality to achieve one final goal, the transfer of two and a half million Palestinian civilians to some other Arab countries neighboring Israel. We can later totally level it and ready it for a new wave of settlers, plus that it has rich reserves of gas as well..... And it's strategically positioned for other projects like the dream of  having a parallel aqueduct/Canal competing or killing the Suez canal.  

My, as always , many thanks to all my good readers, more so in these dark and dangerous times. 

 

Friday, October 13, 2023

THE SAME POLICIES, THE SAME GENOCIDE.....

 


RENEWING AN OLD WAR AND GENOCIDE .......

 

It makes one wonder, why the US and some of the European countries stand behind the escalation and barbarism and apartheid that the extreme right wing fascist government of Israel is following and conducting toward stealing more lands, without their people!!!!  Who's directing who ??? and who's drawing the blue print here . One could only wonder. Most people agree, but not the media nor the administration and the official representatives.....

          This blog was published October the 10th, I'm reproducing it as still very appropriate, in an ongoing miserable situation...... 


Here is an interesting comment I just received from a European-Palestinian friend.

War and all acts of violence are terrible events which create intolerable suffering, human tragedies and destruction in all its forms. As it goes, the attack this week by Hamas on Israel is no different. It is however right to remind ourselves, in the cacophony of Western media and US and Western European politicians (plus Zelensky of all people!!) falling over each other to condemn Hamas, giving Israel a green light to wage a new war on Palestinians, while repeating the tired mantra that Israel has the right to defend itself -- but the Palestinians who have been subjected to a most brutal occupation, dispossession and apartheid do not!! -- it is right to remind ourselves that the root cause of this war is Israel's illegal occupation of Palestinian Territories for the past 50 years in total disregard of all UN resolutions, its effective siege and imprisonment of a population of over 2 million people in Gaza for the past 15 years, and it and its settlers continuing to steal Palestinian land and water in the West Bank and oppressing the Palestinian people.

The West and the US in particular, and Western media, have aided Israeli aggression against the Palestinian people for the past 75 years. The Palestinian people are refusing to die and a nation resisting aggression, defending its human rights, national rights and dignity is not a terrorist nation. Resistance is a right enshrined in the UN charter. The West cannot on the one hand brand the Ukrainian people defending their land as Heroes ( and I support this), then turn around and brand Palestinian fighters defending their nation's very existence as Terrorists. Any objective observer would qualify this as hypocritic, disingenuous, totally lacking in morality.

Israel ethnically cleansed 750'000 Palestinians from their homes in 1948 and conquered 78% of Palestine's territory. Gaza's population is made up with over 75% of refugees who had been forced to flee their homes in pre-1948 Palestine (areas currently within Israel). Since then, Israel has grabbed substantially more Palestinian land, notably in the West Bank and its evident long-term vision is to conquer all of Palestine -- without the Palestinians. I am not making this up. Ministers in Israel's current extreme fascist government have declared this openly on several occasions. This would imply a new ethnic cleansing campaign to get rid of several million Palestinians.

The URL link below addresses this issue and the possibility of Israel using the attack it has suffered to carry out such a campaign. I do not know how things will unfold in the coming days/weeks. Israel will certainly unleash on Gaza and its fighters plus its civilians, all its might, its superior weaponry and firepower, air power and missiles, its total control over Gaza's electric grid and water, etc. It has already destroyed 2 hospitals there. Meetings will be held in the UN which will accomplish little. There will be several thousand additional deaths and untold tragedies and human suffering. I really do ask myself: Why doesn't the US and Western European powers join the rest of the world in forcing Israel to cease its occupation of Palestinian Territories, and its continuous aggression, and allowing a decent 2-state solution to take place?


           Sam.

Here, exclusively, are these rules that everyone must have "in mind" when watching the Television News in the evening. Everything will become easier!
Rule number 1: In the Middle East, it is always the Arabs who attack first and it is always Israel which defends itself. This is called retaliation.
Rule number 2: Arabs, Palestinians or Lebanese do not have the right to kill civilians from the other side. It's called terrorism.
Rule number 3: Israel has the right to kill Arab civilians. This is called self-defense.
Rule number 4: When Israel kills too many civilians, Western powers call on it to show restraint. This is called the reaction of the international community.
Rule number 5: Palestinians and Lebanese do not have the right to capture Israeli soldiers, even if their number is very limited and does not exceed one soldier.
Rule number 6: Israelis have the right to kidnap as many Palestinians as they want (around 12,000 prisoners to date). There are no limits and there is no need to provide any proof of the guilt of the abductees. All you have to do is say the magic word “terrorist”.
Rule number 7: When you say "Resistance", you must always add the expression "supported by Syria and Iran".
Rule number 8: When you say "Israel", you should definitely not add after: "supported by the United States, France and Europe", because one could believe that it is an unbalanced conflict .
Rule number 9: Never speak of “occupied territories”, nor of UN resolutions, nor of violations of international law, nor of the Geneva conventions. This risks disturbing the viewer and listener of the US or of Europe.
Rule number 10: Israelis speak English and French better than Arabs. This explains why they and their supporters are given the floor as often as possible. So, they can explain the previous rules to us (from 1 to 9). This is called journalistic neutrality.
Rule number 11: If you do not agree with its rules or if you find that they favor one party in the conflict against another, then you are a dangerous anti-Semite!!!
A horribly bad situation in the making, let's hope it doesn't lead to another disaster,  all my thanks to my good readers all over. 

Tuesday, October 10, 2023

RENEWING AN OLD WAR, A GENOCIDE AND A TRANSFER .......

 

It makes one wonder, why the US and some of the European countries stand behind the escalation and barbarism and apartheid that the extreme right wing fascist government of Israel is following and conducting toward stealing more lands, without their people!!!!  Who's directing who ??? and who's drawing the blue print here . One could only wonder. Most people agree, but not the media nor the administration and the official representatives.....

          This blog was published October the 10th, I'm reproducing it as still very appropriate, in an ongoing miserable situation...... 


Here is an interesting comment I just received from a European-Palestinian friend.

War and all acts of violence are terrible events which create intolerable suffering, human tragedies and destruction in all its forms. As it goes, the attack this week by Hamas on Israel is no different. It is however right to remind ourselves, in the cacophony of Western media and US and Western European politicians (plus Zelensky of all people!!) falling over each other to condemn Hamas, giving Israel a green light to wage a new war on Palestinians, while repeating the tired mantra that Israel has the right to defend itself -- but the Palestinians who have been subjected to a most brutal occupation, dispossession and apartheid do not!! -- it is right to remind ourselves that the root cause of this war is Israel's illegal occupation of Palestinian Territories for the past 50 years in total disregard of all UN resolutions, its effective siege and imprisonment of a population of over 2 million people in Gaza for the past 15 years, and it and its settlers continuing to steal Palestinian land and water in the West Bank and oppressing the Palestinian people.

The West and the US in particular, and Western media, have aided Israeli aggression against the Palestinian people for the past 75 years. The Palestinian people are refusing to die and a nation resisting aggression, defending its human rights, national rights and dignity is not a terrorist nation. Resistance is a right enshrined in the UN charter. The West cannot on the one hand brand the Ukrainian people defending their land as Heroes ( and I support this), then turn around and brand Palestinian fighters defending their nation's very existence as Terrorists. Any objective observer would qualify this as hypocritic, disingenuous, totally lacking in morality.

Israel ethnically cleansed 750'000 Palestinians from their homes in 1948 and conquered 78% of Palestine's territory. Gaza's population is made up with over 75% of refugees who had been forced to flee their homes in pre-1948 Palestine (areas currently within Israel). Since then, Israel has grabbed substantially more Palestinian land, notably in the West Bank and its evident long-term vision is to conquer all of Palestine -- without the Palestinians. I am not making this up. Ministers in Israel's current extreme fascist government have declared this openly on several occasions. This would imply a new ethnic cleansing campaign to get rid of several million Palestinians.

The URL link below addresses this issue and the possibility of Israel using the attack it has suffered to carry out such a campaign. I do not know how things will unfold in the coming days/weeks. Israel will certainly unleash on Gaza and its fighters plus its civilians, all its might, its superior weaponry and firepower, air power and missiles, its total control over Gaza's electric grid and water, etc. It has already destroyed 2 hospitals there. Meetings will be held in the UN which will accomplish little. There will be several thousand additional deaths and untold tragedies and human suffering. I really do ask myself: Why doesn't the US and Western European powers join the rest of the world in forcing Israel to cease its occupation of Palestinian Territories, and its continuous aggression, and allowing a decent 2-state solution to take place?


           Sam.

Here, exclusively, are these rules that everyone must have "in mind" when watching the Television News in the evening. Everything will become easier!
Rule number 1: In the Middle East, it is always the Arabs who attack first and it is always Israel which defends itself. This is called retaliation.
Rule number 2: Arabs, Palestinians or Lebanese do not have the right to kill civilians from the other side. It's called terrorism.
Rule number 3: Israel has the right to kill Arab civilians. This is called self-defense.
Rule number 4: When Israel kills too many civilians, Western powers call on it to show restraint. This is called the reaction of the international community.
Rule number 5: Palestinians and Lebanese do not have the right to capture Israeli soldiers, even if their number is very limited and does not exceed one soldier.
Rule number 6: Israelis have the right to kidnap as many Palestinians as they want (around 12,000 prisoners to date). There are no limits and there is no need to provide any proof of the guilt of the abductees. All you have to do is say the magic word “terrorist”.
Rule number 7: When you say "Resistance", you must always add the expression "supported by Syria and Iran".
Rule number 8: When you say "Israel", you should definitely not add after: "supported by the United States, France and Europe", because one could believe that it is an unbalanced conflict .
Rule number 9: Never speak of “occupied territories”, nor of UN resolutions, nor of violations of international law, nor of the Geneva conventions. This risks disturbing the viewer and listener of the US or of Europe.
Rule number 10: Israelis speak English and French better than Arabs. This explains why they and their supporters are given the floor as often as possible. So, they can explain the previous rules to us (from 1 to 9). This is called journalistic neutrality.
Rule number 11: If you do not agree with its rules or if you find that they favor one party in the conflict against another, then you are a dangerous anti-Semite!!!
A horribly bad situation in the making, let's hope it doesn't lead to another disaster,  all my thanks to my good readers all over. 

 

Tuesday, October 3, 2023

Kevin McCarthy Parody

Kevin McCarthy Parody
Omar,
I have decided to open an Impeachment Inquiry into President Biden. We don’t have any specific charges, but if we scream about Hunter Biden enough, it just may seem credible. We’ve been investigating President Biden for his entire Presidency, and nothing’s turned up. So we’ve decided impeachment is justified because Donald Trump told us to do so. Donate to Late Breakers PAC to elect Democrats across the country!
While I may not have any "evidence" of wrongdoing, I do have an unhinged far-right caucus that can take away my job at any moment. I need to appease them, so here we are.
In fact, all this talk of “evidence” is pointless. Here’s a comprehensive list of high crimes President Biden is guilty of:
  • Standing by a son who has struggled with addiction
  • Being a Democrat
  • Beating President Trump in an election
  • Being better looking than me at age 80
Now that I’ve announced this impeachment effort, my far-right overlords have given me 93.5 more hours as speaker before they threaten to remove me again. Totally worth it.
It would be a real shame if you donated to Late Breakers PAC and helped them elect Democrats to take away my majority.
Sincerely,
Kevin McCarthy (parody)
Late Breakers PAC
PO BOX 15320
WASHINGTON, DC 20003
Ha ha ha ......  and the masquerade continues big time, while pretending to save the country from defaulting by forcing a government shutdown, and now the extreme  right Republican Trumpists threatening to remove Mr. McCarthy from his leadership position this week..... 
All this was unnecessary. The parties had worked out a suitable agreement back in May. But in the race to please Trump and his ambitions, and confirm his tactics and policies, GOP extremists renegaded and threatened to tie America to the tracks again. 
The deal to avert a shutdown was only a temporary fix. Republicans are poised to push the country to the brink again next month. The only long term solution is to remember these facts come next month, November 2024, and vote accordingly and responsibly, vote to save, and not to destroy America.   
As always my usual many thanks to all for following, be safe and well.  

Saturday, September 23, 2023

AMERICANA.

 


Last Sunday, with great fanfare and weeks of buildup, NBC debuted Kristen Welker as the new host of its flagship weekly news program, “Meet the Press.”

And who was the first guest they had on to mark the occasion? Donald Trump — the liar-in-chief who hadn’t appeared on the show since the insurrection of January 6, 2021.

As anyone could have predicted, Trump spent the interview repeating one dangerous lie after another, talking over Welker, and making a complete mockery of the entire proceedings.

A morning roundup of worthy pundit and news reads, brought to you by Daily Kos. Click here to read the full web version.

  • Maybe Matt Gaetz Is Right
    Maybe Matt Gaetz Is Right, Michelle Cottle, The New York Times
    The dysfunctional dance taking place in the House between Speaker Kevin McCarthy and his right flank has driven me to consider something I never imagined possible: that Matt Gaetz is right.

    A House speaker can be successful only with the confidence of the members who put him or her in charge, when he or she can follow through on promises made and concessions extracted. Indeed, there may be no job in American government that calls for crackerjack deal-making skills more than that of speaker: so many egos, alliances and grievances to manage to keep things moving.

    Mr. McCarthy, in his desperate pursuit of the speakership last winter, ran around making promises willy-nilly to the House’s small band of right-wingers, and he will now rise and fall on how he handles those commitments and expectations. So far, things are not looking good for Kev — and, by extension, for a functional Congress.

  • New ‘Meet the Press’ moderator Kristen Welker fails to meet the moment as Trump unleashes flurry of lies in debut interview
    New ‘Meet the Press’ moderator Kristen Welker fails to meet the moment as Trump unleashes flurry of lies in debut interview, Oliver Darcy, CNN
    The Kristen Welker era of "Meet the Press" is off to a bleak start.

    The high-stakes sit down with disgraced former president Donald Trump was all risk and little reward for Welker as she assumed the esteemed moderator chair of "Meet the Press" for the first time Sunday. Television executives I surveyed before and after the interview were baffled that NBC News and Welker willfully chose to take on such a fraught assignment, given Trump's notorious propensity to lie. As one television executive put it to me, "It was a crazy way to set the tone of what 'Meet the Press' would be under her."

  • Nazi cavorting anti-vaxxer and presidential candidate RFK Jr. is suing Daily Kos for protecting our community. The legal fees are piling up. You can donate $5 here to help us fight back!

  • This is what taking on election deniers really looks like
    This is what taking on election deniers really looks like, Greg Sargent, The Washington Post
    Democrats won a whole lot of elections in 2022, in no small part on their vow to strengthen and defend democracy. But if they hope to turn the issue into a sustained political winner, they have to deliver on that promise by showing voters what a pro-democracy governing agenda actually looks like.

    Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro is set to make a big move in this direction by unveiling a big change on Tuesday that will implement what’s known as “automatic voter registration” statewide.

    Automatic registration makes getting on the voter rolls something you have to opt out of, rather than actively sign up for in advance. An underappreciated success story, it has been put into effect in two dozen states, mostly by Democrats. It typically works by automatically registering customers at state Department of Motor Vehicles offices (or other agencies) or by automatically extending them that option, while offering an opt-out alternative.

  • We Have Two Medias in This Country, and They’re Going to Elect Donald Trump
    We Have Two Medias in This Country, and They’re Going to Elect Donald Trump, Michael Tomasky, The New Republic
    If the press doesn’t get involved in the civic health of the nation, there may not be a nation in which a free press might reside.

    It’s often asked in my circles: Why isn’t Joe Biden getting more credit for his accomplishments? As with anything, there’s no single reason. Inflation is a factor. His age is as well. Ditto the fact that people aren’t quite yet seeing the infrastructure improvements or the lower prescription drug costs.

    There is no one reason. But there is one overwhelming factor in play: the media. Or rather, the two medias. It’s very important that people understand this: We reside in a media environment that promotes—whether it intends to or not—right-wing authoritarian spectacle. At the same time, as a culture, it’s consistently obsessed with who “won the day,” while placing far less value on the fact that the civic and democratic health of the country is nurtured through practices such as deliberation, compromise, and sober governance. The result is bad for Joe Biden. But it’s potentially tragic for democracy
  • How a Vote to Oust McCarthy as House Speaker May Play Out
  • How a Vote to Oust McCarthy as House Speaker May Play Out, Lindsey McPherson, The Messenger
    ‘We would ram it up their rear ends,’ one McCarthy ally said

    If a motion to vacate is triggered, there's three main scenarios for how it may play out: McCarthy prevails with the vast majority of Republicans sticking by his side; the Californian survives with a little help from Democrats; or he's removed as speaker but his allies nominate him again in the absence of an alternative speaker.

    McCarthy this week admitted he’s “frustrated” with the demands from his right flank. In an angry outburst, he dared his GOP critics to trigger a vote on his ouster. big>

    As always, my many thanks to all my good readers.  

Wednesday, September 13, 2023

BIDENOMICS .......

 

Continue reading the main story

SUPPORTED BYSUPPORTED BY logo

September 6, 2023

Author Headshot

By David Leonhardt

Good morning. We’re covering the shift in the Democratic Party’s economic policy — as well as the Proud Boys, Spanish women’s soccer and college dining halls.

President BidenKenny Holston/The New York Times

Undoing inequality

Bill Clinton and Barack Obama both ran for president promising to reinvigorate the economy for ordinary Americans. And both enacted laws that helped millions of people. Clinton expanded children’s health care and tax credits for low-income families. Obama accomplished even more, making it possible for almost anybody to afford health insurance.

Yet neither Obama nor Clinton managed to alter the basic trajectory of the American economy. Income and wealth inequality, which had begun rising in the early 1980s, continued to do so. So did inequality in other measures, like health and life expectancy. Polls continue to show that most Americans are frustrated with the country’s direction.

Note: Income is pretax. | Source: World Inequality Database | By The New York Times

In response, a growing number of policy experts aligned with the Democratic Party have decided in recent years that their party’s approach to economic policy was flawed. They concluded that Democrats had not gone far enough to undo the revolution that Ronald Reagan started in the 1980s — a revolution that sparked the huge rise in inequality.

These Democratic experts have grown skeptical of the benefits of free trade and Washington’s hands-off approach to corporate consolidation. They want the government to spend more money on highways, technological development and other policies that could create good-paying jobs. The experts, in short, believe that they had been too accepting of the more laissez-faire economic agenda often known as neoliberalism.

This turnabout is the central explanation for President Biden’s economic agenda, which White House aides call Bidenomics and will be core to his re-election campaign. He has signed laws (sometimes with bipartisan support) spending billions of dollars on semiconductor factories, roads, bridges and clean energy. He has tried to crack down on monopolies. He has encouraged workers to join unions.

The best description of this shift I’ve yet read appears in “The Last Politician,” a new book about Biden’s first two years in office by Franklin Foer of The Atlantic. Foer tells the story partly through Jake Sullivan, who helped design Biden’s domestic agenda during the campaign and then became national security adviser.

Sullivan was nobody’s idea of a left-wing populist: He is a Rhodes Scholar with two Yale degrees who was a close aide to Hillary Clinton before Biden. But the financial crisis and then Donald Trump’s victory led Sullivan to reflect on Americans’ frustration, and he decided that elites like him had not done enough to address its underlying causes. (Here’s a 2018 article in which I described his shift.)

“An entire generation of young Democratic wonks, with a similar establishment pedigree, found itself in the same brooding mood, tinged with fear,” Foer writes. These wonks built alliances with the more progressive parts of the party — those represented by Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez — during Trump’s presidency. That’s why several Warren protégés, like Bharat Ramamurti, work in senior White House roles today.

Biden himself embodies the shift, too. Although he has long emphasized his humble background in Scranton, Pa., he supported his party’s more neoliberal agenda in the 1980s and 1990s. Recently, he has returned to some of the populist themes that he used to launch his political career a half-century ago. He has lamented the Democratic Party’s drift from working-class families toward college-educated professionals.

New terrain

Much of the 2024 presidential campaign will revolve around the economy’s short-term performance, and both Biden and his Republican critics will be able to cite evidence to make their case. Republicans will note that inflation remains uncomfortably high and that Biden’s pandemic relief spending played a role (albeit a secondary one, as my colleague German Lopez has explained). Biden’s campaign will counter that job growth is solid, and wages have risen across the income spectrum. His investments, in semiconductors and more, seem to be playing a role.

But I would encourage you not to lose sight of the bigger picture during the back and forth of the campaign. The biggest picture is that the post-1980 economy failed to deliver the broad-based benefits that Reagan and his allies promised. So did several economic policies, like expanded global trade, that many Democrats favored.

Biden represents a response to these unfulfilled promises, as do the small but growing number of Republicans pushing their party to change. Whatever happens with the economy over the next year or with Biden’s presidency, the policy debate has shifted.

“Bidenomics sounds banal when plastered as a slogan across the backdrop of a presidential stump speech,” Foer told me. “But it’s more than a set of positive economic indicators. It’s a shift in ideology. For a generation, Democratic presidents were inclined to be deferential to markets, basically uninterested in the problem of monopoly, and lukewarm to unions. Biden has gone in the other direction.”

Related: Some people mistakenly think that “working class” is a euphemism for “white working class.” It isn’t. The American working class spans all races, and the Democratic Party has also lost ground with voters of color, especially those without a four-year college degree. You can read more from my colleague Nate Cohn.

A good and explicit article  about the actual Biden economics and how it's slowly transforming America to the better and to more futuristic economical and social stability . My, as always, many thanks to all.

Sunday, September 3, 2023

U.N. Secretary-General's remarks at the BRICS summit

24 August 2023
Secretary-General's remarks at the BRICS summit
Antonio Guterres
Distinguished Heads of States and Governments,

Excellencies,  

Ladies and gentlemen, 

Let me begin by thanking President Cyril Ramaphosa.

We take great inspiration from the Rainbow Nation’s extraordinary path to unity through action and justice.

That is what our world needs.

Unity for action. And unity for justice.

We are confronting existential challenges.

The climate crisis is spiraling out of control.

A global cost-of-living crisis is raging.

Poverty, hunger, and inequalities are growing against the objectives of the Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development.

New technologies are raising red flags, without a global architecture to deal with them.
Geopolitical divides and conflicts are multiplying with profound global implications, especially the impacts from the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

Excellencies,

We are moving towards a multipolar world, and that is a positive thing.

But multipolarity in itself is not enough to guarantee a peaceful or just global community.

To be a factor of peace, equity, and justice in international relations, multipolarity must be supported by strong and effective multilateral institutions.

Look no further than the situation in Europe at the dawn of the last century.

Europe was multipolar – but it lacked strong multilateral mechanisms.

The result was World War I.  

As the global community moves towards multipolarity, we desperately need – and I have been vigorously advocating for – a strengthened and reformed multilateral architecture based on the UN Charter and international law.

Today’s global governance structures reflect yesterday’s world. 

They were largely created in the aftermath of World War II when many African countries were still ruled by colonial powers and were not even at the table. 
This is particularly true of the Security Council of the United Nations and the Bretton Woods institutions.

For multilateral institutions to remain truly universal, they must reform to reflect today’s power and economic realities, and not the power and economic realities of the post Second World War .

In the absence of such reform –– fragmentation is inevitable.

We cannot afford a world with a divided global economy and financial system; with diverging strategies on technology including artificial intelligence; and with conflicting security frameworks.

The IMF estimates that such a fracture could cost 7 percent of global GDP – a cost that would be disproportionately born by low-income countries, mainly in Africa.

And so I have come to Johannesburg with a simple message: in a fracturing world with overwhelming crises, there is simply no alternative to cooperation.

We must urgently restore trust and reinvigorate multilateralism for the 21st century.

This requires the courage to compromise in the reforms that are necessary for the common good.

It requires full respect for the UN Charter, international law, universal values, and all human rights – social, cultural, economic, civil, and political.
And it requires much greater solidarity.

Of course, none of this is easy.

But it is essential.

And is essential especially for Africa.

The African continent, a historic victim of slavery and colonialism, continues to confront grave injustices.

On average, African countries pay four times more for borrowing than the United States and eight times more than the wealthiest European countries.

And African countries account for just four per cent of global greenhouse gas emissions, but is an epicentre of climate chaos suffering disproportionally impacts of climate change.

Looking ahead, I see two priorities for action and justice.
First, on the economic front. 

Redesigning today’s outdated, dysfunctional, and unfair global financial architecture is necessary, but I know it won’t happen overnight. 
Yet we can – and must – take practical action now.

The Sustainable Development Goals’ Stimulus I have proposed, an effective debt workout mechanism, and other steps necessary to multiple the resources available for developing countries are vital for sustainable development in Africa and to give options to African governments to support the development of their peoples.

We must also drastically step-up climate action and climate justice.

I have put forward a Climate Solidarity Pact in which developed countries provide financial and technical support to help emerging economies – in Africa and beyond – to promote an equitable and just transition to renewable energy.

And I have presented an Acceleration Agenda to boost these efforts – with developed countries committing to reach net zero emissions as close as possible to 2040, and developing countries as close as possible to 2050.

Developed countries must also finally keep their promises to developing countries:  by meeting the $100 billion goal, doubling adaptation finance, replenishing the Green Climate Fund, and operationalizing the loss and damage fund this year.

As a matter of justice, Africa must be considered a priority in all these efforts.

Excellencies,

We will not solve our common challenges in a fragmented way. 

Together, let us work to advance the power of universal action, the imperative for justice, and the promise of a better future.

Thank you.


And yes, I thank you as well, an impressive speech by the UN secretary-general, worth publishing for more audiences.